 “Time is a valuable thing Watch it fly by as the pendulum swings Watch it count down to the end of the day The clock ticks life away” -Linkin Park, In the End Time, perhaps to some, is the most complicated aspect of human experience to define, to truly comprehend, to utilize and to control. Master time or time will master you. Time to the scientist is said to be a measurement. Time to the musician is the speed of a rhythm, and the length of its measure and repetition. Time to the historian is epochal and cyclical. Time to the mystic is timelessness. So which is it? Can a human being live “out of time?” All I can say about time comes from my own time (length) of self-introspection. To me, time is but a measurement of the duration of motion, in simpler terms, it is a length. But a length of what exactly? Like distance, time is the measurement of the speed of traversing said “length” of distance. However, we don’t ask “what is the length of that length?” Like the centimeter is to the second, or the inch to the minute, the foot to the hour, etc., is all related and inseparable. If there were no motion, there would certainly be no time nor distance, nor length of measure at all. So I pondered, if one becomes still, does he or she also become timeless? Think hard on this one. There are people who are slaves to time, they say “I don’t have the time,” or “I’m out of time,” or “there isn’t enough time.” To the master of time, they say “I’ll make time,” or “time is on my side,” or even “I’ve got all the time in the world.” Why the controversy? Does it come down to a simple perception of what time really is? How does one learn to live without or outside of time? Once you start to understand, that without motion, there could be no time. For what would be measured if no length nor distance were covered? What could be quantified if no motion occurred for which to measure the passage of time itself? As to the ruler measuring centimeters or the inch, the clock measures the seconds and the minute, all of which may I remind you are “mental constructs,” for none of these exist in the physical world. If distance is also measured, and the length of time is the speed at which that distance is traversed, then aren’t really the tape measure, the odometer, the clock and the watch more closely related than we think? Is it not possible to combine the tape measure and the clock into one construct? In the mind, are they already one construct which has to be taken apart in the 3D world to be understood? Could Einstein have been mistaken as to the idea of a fourth dimension where time is said to reside? Foolish meanderings of a simpleton if you ask me. Like all new age addicts, dimensions are thoroughly misunderstood and incorrectly conceptualized thanks to this misapplied science-fiction (see my video on "Dispelling Dimensional Madness" coming soon). If you get up “early” or go to bed “late;” what does that really imply? How can one be “early” or “late” in a single unending moment that never began and will never end? Time itself, stems from the relation to the motions of the sun being measurable in hours, days, seasons and years. The cyclical length of time it takes for the sun, planets and stars to go above or below the horizon can be known by optically observing stationary objects such as a sun dial or peering through a telescope to calculate said heavenly motions. The eyes are the measuring system of both distance and time. Without the eyes, which are the optical spheres of 3D motion perception, the measurement of divided light sequences would not be perceptible at all. How then does a man measure his own rising and setting with that of the sun in a correct perspective? The sun always shines, so therefor must something in man always shine? Does the sun sleep? Is there something in man himself that does not sleep? That would be his consciousness. Though the body loses it in rest/sleep, it is still there none the less. Have you ever been awake while you were asleep? Talk about an “out of time’ experience. The eternal mystery is only eternal to the mind trapped in time (sequences). Of that there can be no doubt. But it will not always remain mysterious. The more purpose a man can acquire—the greater the Light in him shines—the simpler the functions and purpose of the Universe to him becomes—the less mysterious. The more darkness he dispels, the brighter the knowing Light of Mind becomes his own consciousness. The great mystery is only solvable in the moment (think on this). What if the universe is far simpler than we have theorized it to be? Is not the purpose of a mystery to uncover/discover its secrets until it is no longer mysterious?  The mystery, ancient, foreboding, insurmountable and cold, may be known to greater and greater degrees, and I assert that is what it was designed to be—its purpose—but only so, through the portal of the mind. Mind is the One immeasurable timeless quality of the human being. Mind is the immeasurable and timeless quality of Nature. The divinity of both are equal expressions of one another in their perceptible and potential qualities. The artist, the poet, the musician, the philosopher, the sculptor and the great thinkers of ages gone by come to mind. These are the ones “out of time,” living in the one ceaseless moment for which there is no measure. If they were truly dead, who then could read their thoughts and words in the books of antiquity? For one cannot measure timelessness any more than an odometer can measure distancelessness. Yet, in being still, one may travel further than the man in the rocket ship having never even moved. When you read the words of the giants among man, are you not transported—transcending the moment as it were—leaving the world behind to enter into a timeless non-dimensional place of mental acuity, focus and imagination? Does not time stop for the creative mind? What if I told you that you can make time stop or start at will? If you could live without time, how much of it then would you have? If limitless time is real, then are we not the makers and masters of it? And, if we can create limited time, then are we not also slaves to our own limitations? Careful consideration is required to gain useful function and application regarding the perception of time, and what it truly is. Mind has within it, the ability to control time. He who lives by the watch, dies by the watch. He who watches the watch is also being watched by it. 25 years ago, I took off my watch and have never worn one since. From that moment, I have been “on” time. I spy the phone to “check” the time. But I do not live by it nor does time “check” me. It lives by me as only I can give it life. And that is how my days flow, my hours breathe, and my minutes focus. I do not count seconds, rather, I live in firsts. For one cannot count a first, only a second—I’m in this to win this. “Second” place is not an option. If there be such a thing as a “length of time,” then isn’t the question to really ask, “what is time’s true length?” Can that length be measured? The answer may surprise you. The length of time is the same as the length of distance. The ruler and the clock are two faces of one coin. Why then, do we measure two different aspects of one and the same coin? Is it because we are tricked into believing we are linear (two-dimensional) beings? Divided in a forced world view of duality (dualism) which is ultra-protected by the priesthoods of antiquity? There is never a mention of the fulcrum in any religion or rarely even in science. Why? Why did Einstein jump over the third dimension to the fourth to explain time? Perhaps he didn’t think things through? Did his inspiration came from theologian Edwin Abbott and his many dimensional ideas contained in the 1884 science fiction novella “Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions.” Or was it Bernhard Riemann's mythematics?  If time be within a fictional fourth dimension, a quality beyond measure as some say—a mental construct as it were, then are love, beauty, silence and stillness also fourth dimensional? I say rubbish. The qualities of mind for which there is no existing body in which to weigh or measure them are dimensionless. They belong to the mind and that is where we will find them, not in another dimension beyond the third, but right here in this reality itself. For your body is here in the three dimensioned universe, unfolded from the second (inert gases) and concurrently existing perpetually, forever in the mind of the first (omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent still white magnetic Light of the mind of the Creator). Fulcrum to motion and back again—in simultaneous sequential interchangings of repetitious reversals. The fulcrum, or undivided, is the realm of your mind. And, you will find no time, distance nor dimension here, which in all true reality, is happening everywhere in the Universe at precisely the same unending, eternal and undying moment, which is absolute and unmeasurable. If the historian can see epochal time in a new way, is man then truly bound to repeat history as they say? Or is there another way “to see things” that will make clear the forest through the trees? If the musician can absorb the idea of a measure or song being ‘eternity’ played for but a moment, started and stopped, then can he not apprehend that said ‘eternity’ never began nor ever ends? If the scientist can validate the “arrow of time” as being also, the bow from which it was loosed, can he not also garner the limitless power behind a single eternal moment? Will he not see the triality beyond duality for which the whole of his materialist philosophy will crumble into dust? The mystic, out of time, has sung the eternal song through the finest arts, recorded his ponderings throughout the epochs of history, and left his words for the world to ignore or embrace. How may the moment come if it has always been here and always will be for ever and ever? One may wake up in time, or wake up to time. But one cannot do both simultaneously. Where are you in time? And where is time in you? If duality is sleep, two dimensional in its scope and effects, what then lies beyond it? Is triality then the world of the awake? And how long will it take to get there if we are the slaves of time? If perceptual change is not the forerunner of true progress, then shall regress always be our lot? Can we not find purpose concerning time as both tool and measure, an extension of the mind for us to master? Or shall we be forever slaves of a non-existent ruler? Given enough time, you will find that time is not time as you once thought, rather, that thought is simply out of time. He who maketh time masters life—dances upon the strings of the stars. He dare not calleth out the day, for he knows the night shall follow. Though divided light may glimmer and fade, betwixt the darkened shadows, ONE Light shines forever, brilliant, Divine—eternally hallowed. That Light is Mind, from which all and time doth unfold and refold The limitless eternal undying prime actuality. Being itself. Behold! -MBP Matt PrestiMetaAuthor | Philosopher | Poet
0 Comments
 “Jung has done in the twentieth century A.D. what the Hindus did in perhaps the eighth century B.C.; he has discovered empirically the existence of an immortal soul in man, dwelling outside time and space, which can actually be experienced. This soul Jung, like the Hindus, calls the "self"... [which is] extremely difficult to describe in words. Hence his "self" is as hard to grasp as the Indian atman.” ~ Robert Charles Zaehner How can a human being truly understand duality if it operates solely from within duality? Can a fish understand water while in it? If there is nothing beyond duality, then this article is mute, D.O.A. It will serve no purpose other than, perhaps the horrifying possibility that it may give rise to another religion whose ignorance overlooks such self-evident knowledge by default. A belief in the transcendence of dualism, without any proof to substantiate or even attempt explanation of its existence is tantamount to cheap and meaningless pseudo-spirituality forged in a cult and cauldron of personality. Tell the fish about the world of air above the water and they scoff, laugh, mock, sneer, and swarm. For our collective protection, only duality is permissible as an acceptable reality, and hammered through one thick skull after another NIGHT and DAY. It is taught MORNING and EVE in all the world’s GOOD and EVIL religions, RICH and POOR schools, BIG and SMALL universities, governments (LEFT and RIGHT), and is the thought-controlling insurmountable law, which binds the minds of men eternally without compromise, nor recompense. It is the Pharisees’ LAW by which no human is allowed to transcend under penalty of death, either intellectual, spiritual or physical. There can be no unity of self while in such a dualistic incarceration and internment camp. Even God himself is chained to it—lessened of such imaginative omniscience to satisfy the surety and certainty of the sense-based thinker. The authorities (senses) have barred the gates. The way is shut, and the dead (dualists) keep it. The priesthood of duality stands at the gates of oblivion (self-savior-ship); to hold back those who just might dare to pass. You shall not pass! Suffer the staff with beatings should you inquire as to a nature beyond the ordinary dualist-minded prison colony. True nature is not a super nature (supernatural), but rather a quiet one which explains why no one hears it! It is a still nature which explains why no one sees it! It cannot be heard nor seen with any faculty that we mere human beings possess—otherwise known as ‘the senses.’ It does not respond to stimuli nor react to experiments or measurements. It is not quantifiable, nor can it be weighed. But it is there none the less. Simply because something is invisible, doesn’t mean it is nonexistent. Emerson, Blake, Whitman, Russell, and even Jung have hinted at its reality. For example: How would a man weigh his knowledge? By the very quarantine zone of empiricism erected by the dualists, knowledge must by right be a measurable commodity within the psyche of man. Some men have a great deal more than others, yet it is NOT measurable. It cannot be extracted, put on a scale and weighed by the pound. There is no standard test to prove nor show conclusively otherwise. The same goes for love. To think such immesuarable qualities as measurable, proposes madness as intelligence. To think of them as “non-existent” also amounts to madness. Madness will always be madness until the light of knowledge may expel such odorous fumes of mental midgetry. Ignorance of existence beyond mere dualism breeds contempt for such familiarity to a true thinker. What the authorities champion, the wise cast aside. Lesser minds should not hinder one’s own desire for progression. To ask the question defeats the answer if you don’t seek to know the answer. Eventually, if one contemplates long enough, one must conclude that dualism is a necessary and unfortunate limitation to one’s potential. Us vs. them. Right vs. wrong. Up vs. down. Left vs. right. Evil vs. good. Consciousness vs. unconsciousness. The man who knows polarity (opposites) and only polarity (opposites) is dealing in absolutes. He is a Sith Lord. Refuse the middle at your own risk. It doesn’t make the phenomenon of the fulcrum non-existent by such a refusal. One sees the moving guitar string yet fails to notice the two controlling fulcrums on which the string itself vibrates, the shaft upon which the wheel turns or the doorjamb upon which the door swings. He would even deny the fulcrum of his very own self—the resting place and driver’s seat of the body, mind and soul.  If genius and its knowledge were owed to schools, courses would be taught on genius. Genius therefor, belongs to something of an entirely different nature and cause. It does not come from books. It comes from within the mind and not the outer dualistic world, lest it would be cheapened and sold on every fucking street corner by every knowledge hooker and pimp on earth. If there be no new knowledge, what then is the point to the human being? Humanity would not progress whatsoever. And that is a horrifyingly dismal thought. What can be said of the mind if it is not the brain alone, neither right nor left in hemisphere? All the textbooks in the world are useless if they serve only intellectual conformity. You may read them all and still be unable to grasp new knowledge. Parroting, repeating and remembering is not knowledge, thus ‘learning by Rote’ as a process is rendered inert. The application in one’s life regarding self-expression, is an integration of information within the very unique quality of self-knowledge often resulting in originality, authenticity and true transformational progress. If the mind be tangible as in an object, then cutting off some part of the human body should affect the knowledge of the human. Perhaps in the criminal, you may find this reaction true concerning the thinking and thoughts of a human. Steal a loaf of bread, cut off a hand and the lesson is learned—the behavior is changed. In the babe, touch the hot stove—never touch it again. But in a man or woman of principle, how many were burned at the stake, drawn and quartered and yet NEVER recanted their knowledge to the agents of such barbarous and torturous conformity? Recant Giordano! Or else! Though they were put to death, their knowledge went with them intact. Some were made martyrs and others called mystics—a multitude of others forgotten. But the effect they had on the living lasted and persists in many cases. These great ones were indeed the challengers of the status-duo. For what is the trivium but where three roads meet? Duality and YOU. But there is no YOU is DUAL. I do not play games with words, but to convey such an idea, one must write and speak in order to communicate. Lao Tzu, the Chinese mystic said “he who knows doesn’t say; he who says doesn’t know.” I’M GLAD HE “SAID” THAT. He violated his own knowledge and wisdom to provide knowledge and wisdom in his Dao. Now that’s a bugger! No point I make in this writing should cause you to build frames and scaffolding in your mind. If they have, then I have failed. TEAR THEM ALL DOWN! Think for yourself or don’t think at all. Enter triality. The middle aspect. The narrow path least chosen, or rather least noticed in this example. If a balance be not centered by a fulcrum, how could it measure weight at all? Would the pendulum swing without a non-moving prime actuality? Could a human body, an animal, a plant or even mineral operate at all? Always forgotten, overlooked and unrecognized is the center—that which does not move and what primitive man called the invisible God, in alchemy the prima materia, the vesica Pisces, Philosopher’s stone or savior child (the one). The most obvious place from which all motion springs if one recognized the stillness which begets all motions—even in this seeming duality. The hemispheres couldn’t be without the division of a center point being the start and finish of all motions. You need more proof? Hold a seed in your hand. Every fucking bit of proof that a unity must divide in two directions of motion to exhibit what we call life and death is there to be beheld. Both are contained in the seed—the root and the tree both—its very life and death! Without division of the seed, NOTHING CAN GROW. You as a fetus rooted to your mother’s placenta for example. Your two halves dividing over and over again from the center outward, becoming limbs, hands, arms, eyes, ears—all in divine symmetry, mirroring the invisible within the seed itself (notwithstanding deformities and the like). Seed is the evidence of the proof of mind as a priori (cause).  Art as knowledge expressed. Knowledge cannot be born from motion nor division. For motion and division are the gatekeepers of true knowledge where fear dare not tread. Fear is a tourniquet of the soul and its underlying desire for expression. Fear is but one more acceptance of duality as being the insurmountable ‘end all be all.’ Art is the expressive marriage into rebirth of that which would otherwise drag mankind backwards to the grave and blackness of his primality, or lower nature. True art holds an aesthetic measure which must meet eye to inner eye within its beholder, lest it be another psychological bandage to the unhealed wounds of ten thousand years. While the externalist praises the polarity of nature and deals in absolutes, the mystic knows its unity by knowing art as the unification of polarity (opposites)—not to discount them, but to surmount the regrettable limitations of being literally ‘split in two.’ In fact, art is the unification of hemispheres, from which pours forth—true original expression in its varied forms. Being the experience of wholeness, it brings tears to the eyes and overwhelms the senses of those who behold such artistic works. It lives beyond the forecasts of segregated time. Its lasting ability is such because it was conceived before division, in wholeness. And in wholeness, it always lives despite the rise or fall of civilizations. What is timeless is called knowledge, and it is not divided. The highest expression of knowledge is called art. Beauty is its undivided principle. If art moves the soul, it is judged beautiful. Only decadence born from ignorance of inspiration putrefies the soul, shunning the recognition of its own transcending qualities to vainly reinforce division. To the materialist, there is one absolute - duality. To the mystic, the invisible is EVERYTHING. Triality is a word that would suffice to bring context and recognition of that which is undivided within man himself—the mind supreme—his God. The supreme inspiration of the many mystics to walk this earth, have again and yet again pointed to the wholeness principle recognized within themselves, as the source of their greatest potential and creations—the height of their very life. The inner most recognition of the divinity within man himself—God found and returned. That which is “blinding White Light.” Where in the blinding White Light can shadow dwell? I could paste one thousand quotes after another thousand quotes that point to this. In duality, shadow without sunlight, and sunlight without shadow would be a calamity. I am not asking you to suspend your belief in divided light, which must have its shadow and its unconscious. Recall the God of duality in all religions, even unto psychology. I am asking if you’ve begun to suspect something within you that is undivided—that is whole and immortal. I am asking if you have directly experienced your own inner Light. Man is a divided being who has yet to discover his undivided qualities belonging to the soul. This is also where he will find the God he has always sought. We play with words, try to define them only to eventually find their limitations and redefine them over and again. In this quest to uncover the Light within, we have to go within. The undiscovered country. The home of the great mystery. We know of our ocean depths on this planet; of rocks and minerals; of species and plants; of planets and stars. Why do we know so little about our own soul and mind? From psychology came the alignment of myth and archetype; of behavior and programming; of mind control and liberation. From the undivided mind comes the imagination, inspiration and creativity. Mind is not an opposite, rather a form of wholeness which opposites cannot fully integrate thus explaining the very small number of truly mindful humans to walk the earth. In the mystical experience, the man crosses the bridge from dualism into trialism. He becomes aware of opposites as effects of his very own undivided nature. He who can command his own opposites may command his universe. The worlds collide as he apprehends his bliss. Creation pours forth from the soul a wild river. He alone steers his vessel and controls his rudder. If consciousness [God] isn’t omnipresent, why then is it everywhere you go? Do you not see this is the actuality of universal mechanics? Man is a primate, especially regarding matters of the mind. A light dimmed is not unlit. As to the question of the so-called unconscious, it is no different than the word ‘unknown.’ Just because a human, or even a race of humans haven’t some perk of knowledge doesn’t make them all ‘unconscious.’ They are very conscious indeed of a great many things, but not conscious of what they do not yet know. The unknown therefore is not unconscious. It simply awaits consciousness to take note and discover, in other words, it exists in the realm of mind itself, waiting, always waiting. This is the home of potentiality. I know, therefore I am. I don’t care how many academicians pointed and focused their minds on a so-called ‘unconscious’ in man. Should I not point to consciousness as the prime actuality/mover simply to limit myself because said predecessors were also self-limited as to the scope of their own thinking? Can not a man continually acquire new ways and ponderings regarding his own mind? The question of God? Are we to be limited and confined to one book or one approved way of perceiving inside the nice comfortable box of conformity regarding God and the so-called unanswerable? Should we only consider and worship the shoulders of the giants alone and not pass go? Giving credit where credit is due is dutiful. Limiting yourself to another's base of knowledge is folly. Is illuminating new knowledge of mind attainable? Are we in fact able to become more cosmic than first we suspicioned? Can we go beyond the giants of thought ourselves? I maintain that is our purpose and reason for being thinkers at all. To go beyond all the perceived limitations of the human being which consequentially fulfills its destiny and purpose. New thinking is always barred, outlawed—even before it’s completely born out. The mental abortionists stand ready to cut out the unborn thought. If the academician doesn’t limit you, the crowd will. You’ve no right to speak here. This is our (academia’s) territory. Piss off you wanker. The way is shut and the dead (academia) keep it. We (academia) play with words while the world plays with itself. Mental boxes are hell holes of the mind. Boxes are for storing rigid thoughts. The brown recluse loves boxes. Time to live folks. There is no mold in the genius mind, rather mold is something that helps to decompose corpses. A knowing mind gathers no mold. It is long past time to know. Look at what the lack of knowing has done to our precious human world. Knowing removes the need for questions. To ask the question defeats the answer. Matt PrestiNeologist | Philosopher | Trialitarian  Today, I give you the keys. Today, it’s your turn to drive (this should put all the self-help gurus out of business). NO MORE MIDDLEMEN! Mind. The basis of all reality. The beginning and end. Alpha and Omega. 1. Consciousness is ‘a priori’ and a.k.a. Mind/Soul/Spirit/Self. All man made items and things are evidence of man’s Mind as Cause. Mind knows, and by thinking through the brain, acts to create ALL man made items and things. I enter into evidence ALL man made items and things as exhibit 1, which qualifies as quantitative scientific empirical proof of this postulate. 2. Test of postulate #1. Think of turning on a light switch. You know from experience how to do this. In knowing, you have two options to complete this test. • Option 1. In order for the ‘light’ to exist as a perceivable physical body, which can then be electrically sensed by others (empirical reduction), your mind must think through your brain in order to take the action by controlling the arm and finger to flip on the light switch. Go ahead and flip it. Behold, the ‘light’ now shines as proof/evidence of Mind as Cause which all may ‘see.’ • Option 2. Do not flip the light switch. Mind knows that to ‘flip’ the switch, one must think and act. By not flipping the ‘light’ switch, there was no extension of Mind through the brain to complete the action of flipping the switch—therefore, no ‘light’ occurred. The thought/action was voided at the source, the Mind itself. 3. Postulate #1 was verified by the scientific method. Therefore, it is true. 4. Being Conscious of Consciousness—this is where it gets tricky. The ancient trickster (brain) strikes again. All fear, anxiety, depression, anger, upset, and imbalances of any kind extend from E-lectrical (e)-motions of brainwaves as do happiness, joy, satisfaction or calm. There is no E-motion in Mind itself. Mind is E-(c)static only. It divides by thinking through the brain and seemingly exists by acting through the body. It creates mind waves called bodies (Nature and man made) which fulfill its purpose and desire through electric cycles of motion (time). Thought as idea is a timeless notion. But thought is not physical, nor is it dimensional. Consciousness, a.k.a. Mind/Soul/Spirit/Self is pure-awareness. Pure-awareness can cause, observe, perceive and study thoughts (software). You are NOT your thoughts (software). Your Soul/Spirit/Self/Consciousness cannot become aware of itself by sensing or acting about it. One must think about WHAT is thinking in order to first notice the prime actuality. The one thinking about WHAT is thinking is the ONE your ego is searching for. This can also be referred to as getting behind your brain/motion/outer senses, arresting your thoughts, stopping your thinking, silent prayer, meditation, and the like. 5. “Mind knows. It does not learn.” ~Walter and Lao Russell. Brains learn. Electric repetitive patterns (lesson plans, teachings, job duties, behaviors, politics, laws, rules, expectations, agreements, physical experiences, etc.) are loaded like software by every externalism known to mankind, in other words, life. School, parents, academia/universities, tv, media, careers, society, governments, religions and culture are all software learned from the external world and patterned onto the brain. To attempt identification of the Soul/Self/Spirit from any method external, including but not limited to the senses, ingesting substances, joining groups, gurus, religious or occult organizations, or other modalities, will only serve to hinder such a supreme discovery/uncovery. Though some of these may be beneficial in your unfoldment, as all experience is essentially good in that regard, ultimately, the final destination is within. Only through you, by you and within YOU, can this great realization take place. 6. The Soul/Self/Spirit in man is exactly 90° to his motion body, centering him always (this is why materialist science cannot find consciousness in the brain and therefore assumes it to be an effect of the brain). The Nazarene called this the kingdom of God within man. Only through Me (awareness of the location/fulcrum/Self/Soul/Spirit/God in Man) may one come to the Father/Mother God in Man (Balance). He did not mean his physical flesh as the priesthood so gravelly mistook and corrupted these words of wisdom. This very fact remains unknown by virtually all religious modalities (materialistic science included) the world over, which hail their priesthoods as the official go between Divinity and man himself. It has also resulted in such barbarism as the eating of flesh and drinking of the blood of Christ in rituals carried on today. It’s even gone so far as to so-called holy men taking vows of poverty while attempting to rid themselves of all desire in a vain effort to appear more Godly, when in fact, a Universe without desire would be absolutely purposeless. All priesthoods depend and thrive on these ‘unknowns’ in order to survive in their current paradigm of being mid-level managers over man’s own spirit. The absolute need to place oneself (priest) between God and the Individual (Man) is laid bare when this fact is considered. To come to the Soul/Self/Spirit/Geist/God/Kingdom of Heaven within, one must turn their outer awareness vertical/90° toward inner awareness (inner eyes and inner ears). It is then and only then, that one becomes Conscious of Consciousness. It is then and only then, that one may COMMAND matter and all of its attributes. Matter will also give up its secrets once this is attained. One’s own thoughts may be intentionally crystallized at will over time/motion, and all 'wishing' retreats. Luck dies and chance ceases. The man is freed from his own excuses. Life becomes absolute in purpose and resolute in Cause. Obstacles become opportunities as enemies (physical, mental, spiritual) become friends (teachers, experiences, surmounted shadows). 7. This process may takes years and even lifetimes. It requires patience, practice and pursuit. It cannot be bought, sold, bargained, traded nor exchanged. It is not an item one may purchase off the shelf of man made things. It will not come by force, tricks, wisecracks, reason, wit nor manpower. It won’t yield, submit, surrender or concede. It will not magically appear through wishful thinking, substance ingestation, nor payments in gold or other currencies. True power does not come from any externalism whatsoever. No man, priest, pastor, reverend, guru, monk, saint, politician, parent, teacher, master, slave, human, alien, animal, plant, mineral or otherwise can give power to a man. The man who thus centers himself in alignment with Nature, with the God of Nature, centers himself in his own Divine (DIVIDE - 90°) Light of his very Soul/Spirit/Geist/God. He enters into the Kingdom—his mountaintop. He is free and powerful—as mighty as all Nature. He KNOWS. He asks and he receives. His true power is unlike any force of man, for he IS FORCE ITSELF. HE BECOMES THE FULCRUM, THE STILLNESS, THE SILENCE. HE IS TIMELESS—IMMORTAL. HE KNOWS HIS POWER AND PURPOSE—HE LIVES WITH INTENT AND COMMANDS HIS BODY TO FULFILL HIS PURPOSE. HE IS ONE WITHIN HIMSELF. #MIND #PURPOSE #GOVERTICAL #ALCHEMIZED #TRANSMUTED #SAVED Matt PrestiMetaAuthor | Philosopher |
Matt PrestiThis is where I post my thoughts, writings, interviews and various creative productions. Feel free to share the links. Archives
December 2024
|
RSS Feed
