Reality is NOT a dimension. Rather, it HAS dimension.
This documentary was created to take down the "belief" in higher dimensions. The fraud of the age fueled by gnosticism, mythematics, newage scientism and unthinking adherents to this cult of fiction will be deposed accordingly in this presentation.
References, Notes and Research– Dispelling Dimensional Madness
“Every action is voided as it occurs, is repeated as it is voided, and is recorded as it is repeated.” Walter & Lao Russell – The Voidance Principle “The masses have never thirsted after truth. Whoever can supply them with illusions is easily their master.”  Gustave Le Bon "Mathematics is a body of knowledge, but it contains no truths." Morris Kline “The very foundation of science is to keep the door open to doubt.” ― Carlo Rovelli Research Links: Stephen M. Miller – A Short History of the Fourth Dimension  http://www.smphillips.mysite.com/ashorthistoryofthefourthdimension.html Lewis Carroll  https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20427391600alicesadventuresinalgebrawonderlandsolved/ https://www.cambridgeplatonism.divinity.cam.ac.uk/view/texts/normalised/Hengstermann1679D https://www.britannica.com/topic/gnosticism/Diversityofgnosticmyths D’Arcy to Whitehead  https://www.huffpost.com/entry/threedimensionsofspacedarcythompsonletter_b_59f040a0e4b00a4ce5a222cd Gnosticism vs Hermeticism Philosophy https://thecultmachine.com/gnosticismvshermeticism/ On the fraud Henry Slade  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Slade https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/encyclopediasalmanacstranscriptsandmaps/sladehenryd1905 Mark Blacklock on Hinton  https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/thefourdimensionallifeofmathematiciancharleshowardhinton/ John Crab – Notes on the Fourth Dimension  https://roughlydaily.com/tag/chhinton/  https://publicdomainreview.org/essay/notesonthefourthdimension Dimensions  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimension On four dimensional space  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourdimensional_space On C.H. Hinton  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Howard_Hinton Bernhard Riemann  https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/201306/physicshistory.cfm Princeton on Hinton  https://paw.princeton.edu/article/charleshowardhintonhewrotesciencefictiongenreexisted On Sir William Crookes – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Crookes On Johann Karl Friedrich Zollner  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johann_Karl_Friedrich_Z%C3%B6llner Victorian Ghosts  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMDxC2YDCU Hugh Everett – Multiverse  https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn26261hugheverettthemanwhogaveusthemultiverse/ The fifth dimension in science  https://sciencing.com/5thdimension11369444.html String Theory  https://www.space.com/17594stringtheory.html Kaluza Klein theory  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaluza%E2%80%93Klein_theory Fourth dimension in art  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_dimension_in_art Mathematics and Art  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematics_and_art Escapism  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escapism Escapist Fiction  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escapist_fiction On Dissociation  https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/dissociation On Blavatsky  https://blavatskytheosophy.com/thesevenplanes/ On a 5th dimension  https://sciencing.com/5thdimension11369444.html Books and Research: “The Universal One” by Walter Russell (1926) “Elements” – Euclid (300 BC) “De Caelo” – Aristotle (350 BC) “On Dimensionality” (Now Lost) – Ptolemy 150 C.E. “Enchiridion Metaphysicum” – Henry More (1671), Term – “Essential Spissitude” [coined “Gnosticism” and “fourth dimension” “Dimensions“  JeanBaptiste le Rond d'Alembert (1754) “Theory of Analytic Functions”  Joseph Louis Lagrange (1797) Carl Friedrich Gauss – Nikolai Lobachevsky – Johann Bolyai – Bernhard Riemann – Refuted Euclid’s 5th Postulate Georg Friedrich Bernhard Riemann  Lecture at Göttingen June 10th, 1854  “On the Hypotheses Which Lie at the Foundations of Geometry” – Curvature of Space “Kings Dethroned” by Gerard Hickson Johann Karl Friedrich Zöllner– “Transcendental Physics” (1880) “The Manufacture and Sale of St. Einstein” by Christopher Jon Bjerknes “What is the Fourth Dimension (1880), “A New Era of Thought” (1888) – “Scientific Romances Vol. I & II” (18841886) – “The Fourth Dimension” 1904 by Charles Howard Hinton “Science and Hypothesis”  Henri Poincaré (1902) “NonEuclidean geometry deals with curves, curves like hyperbola and ellipses, which could be interesting if and only if the mathematical expression of our visible universe would be based on those curves, which it isn't. The planetary motions (for example) are not conic sections, although it kind of looks like they are. They are based on the logarithmic spiral and if you examine that kind of math in detail you will find that while the spiral is a curve or has a curvature, the straight line is a special case of the mathematical expression of that curve. So a math that is based on or pretends to be based only on curvature is either faulty or probably won't tell you everything. Moreover, this math based on the logarithmic spiral is quite simple, once you start exploring it, and you don't need exotic mathematical structures to express or predict what our visible reality is capable of. Interesting note is that Kepler's second law still holds and that the golden section is a special case of the spiral. Keep it simple, is, imho, always the best approach. As for the curvature of space, I'd stick with Russell's concept of all directions being curved and all motion spiral. But keep in mind that the mathematical expression of the spiral contains a straight line as a possibility.” –HVH “Einstein's theory of relativity has nothing to do with the object itself, which undergoes no change in its dimensions and for which time (in terms of dilation etc...) does not change when it is in motion. So yes, for this object the length, width and thickness are essentially found in combination. But when we perceive it and when motion is involved there is a distortion and change in dimensions (length, width and thickness will change differently) because of the light waves that will reach us and the image we perceive is made of older and newer light. The light coming from a point further away will be light that reached us earlier when the object in motion was closer than the light coming from a closer point that reached us later, making the different dimensions (length, width and thickness) appear to be seemingly independent quantities, because they 'react' differently upon our eye. But none of this is actually real, it's only there because of our perception.” –HVH "I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. It might as well be said that God has properties. He has not, but only attributes and these are of our own making. Of properties we can only speak when dealing with matter filling the space. To say that in the presence of large bodies space becomes curved is equivalent to stating that something can act upon nothing. I, for one, refuse to subscribe to such a view." –Nikola Tesla “Tesla's quote is ok, but note the caveat regarding Einstein's curved space: Einstein, or whomever behind him, understood the fact that motion of a body entails or evokes curvature, and instead of calculating the motions and acceleration of a moving body starting from zero motion, and hence defining its path thereby, he chose to start with or instead define a curved experimental framework (matrix) and use curved math for this. The curvature in his system has nothing to do with mechanical motion and a force acting on a body, but is simply a mathematical reference system or frame. The frames or fields are nonaccelerating expressions, and one of Einsteins's postulates is; "The laws of physics are identical in all nonaccelerating (i.e. inertial) frames". In these local frames he made time constant and absolute because of his only assumption: the constancy of the speed of light. In every local frame, time and length of an object are linked because of the constancy of the speed of light. In each frame, a body is assumed to move freely in any way in the presence of gravity at its own constant speed, according to its own frame of reference. The transformations Einstein uses are necessary when you move to an adjacent field, where velocity is measured differently, or where the frame of reference is different. So acceleration, according to Einstein's method, is a function of the mathematical computational framework jumping from one field to another, and has nothing to do with force acting on a body. With Einstein, we don't know why the field curves, we just know that it curves. There is no actual force involved, only math is involved. So in relativity, the only thing doing something, is the math involved. It is NOT about the real thing, but it is a theory. It is a measurement system, with the aim of making measurements from a distance. It's a theory of how things look, not how they are. So Einstein's 'curved space' has nothing to do with reality, it is a system, a matrix designed with mathematics, and it is NOT how or what space actually is. Einstein's space is curved only because he uses nonEuclidean math or curved math! Real space is not curved.” –HVH "There is a clear difference between what is considered to be a belief & what is considered to be a scientific process. For good reason, a scientific process is not meant to be followed as a belief system & a belief system is not meant to be followed as a scientific process. One of the most dangerous forms of science is when it is trusted blindly as a belief system, when really that is not its intended purpose. Hence the censorship & problems we see in the world throughout society today. Science is never settled & certainly there will never be a point where it is without questioning. Neither should there ever be a point where a belief should be trusted to the point where you are no longer able to reason with your own mind and to discern with your own conclusion."  Sy Ox
Matt Presti
Banisher  Expeller  Producer
1 Comment
1/7/2023 10:39:26
I'm guessing HVH is Hanna. It think she hit the nail on the head with her comments about Einstein. Einstein's Special and General Relativity was my favorite book of all time until I found Walter Russell's The Universal One.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. 
Matt PrestiThis is where I post my thoughts, writings, interviews and various creative productions. Feel free to share the links. Archives
November 2023
